Join linkinn Login
 
Home
Pictures Video Links topics people blog Submit New
RSS
Add to Google
Random Hot Popular New Upcoming Posted Saved Stats
727
 
corn field
By fabric Hot 53 days ago views: 137163


corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field


corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field

corn field


corn field

Show comments (83) Share Url
Add your comments anonymously: (or register here)

Anonymous
0 points
19 hours ago
Wow, i can't believe how picky people can be!! I think they are all great in their own way. Who cares if they have been photoshopped, each to their own i say!
Anonymous
0 points
1 day ago
Those pictures are AMAZING. Of course it might be P-Shopped, but that doesn't make them look worse. If you do make-up or shave your bear you also "photoshop" yourself :)
Anonymous
0 points
3 days ago
they lighting just with the sky and the landscape just dont match it looks too fake
Anonymous
0 points
3 days ago
they lok good but i have no respect for people who just photoshop pictures to make them look the way they want it just shows that they cant get a good picture
Anonymous
0 points
8 days ago
My eyes don't care if something's Photoshopped. They just really like a lot of these pictures.
Anonymous
-1 points
13 days ago
Mes yeux ne versent plus de larmes ŕ la vue de tant de beauté ! Merci ArTs
Anonymous
-1 points
16 days ago
Beautiful.
Anonymous
-1 points
19 days ago
Brilliant
Anonymous
-1 points
19 days ago
sorry clikt the wrong button. Well don't listen to the photoshop ravers out there. Your images have a surreal taste to them and i'm liking it. but hey who am i to say, just do it and enjoy for what it is
Anonymous
-1 points
19 days ago
Anonymous
-1 points
19 days ago
No one can change what nature created by using photoshop and some people may think its a crime to alter a perfectly good photograph of nature. But advertising firms pay top dollar for people like the author of these renderings who learned their craft by having fun with a wonderful tool like photoshop. Lead fabric you are better than most. You've dazzled me.
Anonymous
-1 points
21 days ago
I just took a look at the girl on the road with the flowers. everything is wrong here! it's 3 and a half photos poorly stitched together! the image of the field clearly had the sun out of the frame to the cameras left. the girl doesnt even have a shadow, now do her feet touch the ground. her lighting is completely wrong. she missing her right hand, instead she has a pixilated bunch of fake flowers. then the sky is just added in on top of whatever should be there, likely some hills our a mountain. the sky has no detail at all, its just grey with a "sun" stuck in there. on a similar note, the last photo, the bottom half with the bailed grain clearly had a setting sun roughly behind the camera. taken during what photographers call "the golden hour" when the sun is about to set and everything gets a beautiful golden hue. the top half is from a completely different image and throws the lighting off on the whole thing. you can even see very stark lines of where the bails end and the fake sky begins. this lone should be soft and real!
Anonymous
-1 points
21 days ago
put the photoshop down before someone gets hurt! the photos where you added a sun, or a barn, or a huge pink blower in the foreground with completely the wrong lighting and a stark cut off from the flower to sky.. just poorly done. yes, some of the skies are fun to look at, well done there, but many of these pictures have been butchered by bad photoshoping! if i can instantly look at the photo and tell that its really two images hastily pasted together with a filter or two applied, there is work to be done. A- for idea. D for execution. needs some work.* *read: less bad photoshop ps: if these photos are stolen from devient art, then you should be shamed and have all these photos removed. maybe even sued.
Anonymous
-1 points
23 days ago
just know it alls...it doesnt matter..love clour,and subject in some are just...wow...like a good book for me..thank u very much..u made my day.
Anonymous
-1 points
24 days ago
cool photographs ... horrible PHOTOSHOPING (start with the skies)! Too bad! It's just destroying everything.
Anonymous
-1 points
28 days ago
Photoshop's used quite brashly in these pictures, where many of them would be beautiful without it. None the less many are of originally great composition and several are benefited by the enhancements.
Anonymous
-1 points
29 days ago
this photographer needs a photoshop 12 step program
Anonymous
-1 points
30 days ago
At what point it stops being photography and starts being just painting? Wherever that line is, I do believe you crossed it quite irreverently.
Anonymous
-1 points
36 days ago
All of these photos have been stolen from various accounts at www.deviantart.com Shame on you for not at least crediting which of the tallented photographers you stole this work from.
Anonymous
-1 points
36 days ago
Shitty. some nice fake HDR. but quit using the morph or whatever it is.
Anonymous
-1 points
37 days ago
grate
Anonymous
-1 points
37 days ago
BEAUTIFUL
Anonymous
-1 points
38 days ago
...pay absolutely no attention to the braindeads that diss you about the photoshop enhancements. Any serious photographer is going to know how to use photoshop and implement it regularly. Your images are excellent, just keep building on your skills. And listen to your own instincts...not the jealousy of naysayers.
Anonymous
-1 points
38 days ago
Wonderful works of art. The pictures are beautiful. Good use of lighting and color enhancement. I like how you made the structures appear abstract. Very nice.
Anonymous
-1 points
39 days ago
Too fake for me.
FredEx
-1 points
39 days ago
Beautiful photos, or should I say, art? I feel you've taken it beyond great photography to a high level of art. For those who feel they can do this level of work so easily, show it.
Anonymous
-1 points
39 days ago
Hello, a Rye comment: Wheat is to Corn as Snapshot is to Photoshop - the latter is a sweetened version Great use of contrast in content and composition. I see Desktop Backgrounds !
Anonymous
-1 points
42 days ago
Playboy enhances their photos, but it does not mean the photographer is not talented or the model is not beautiful. It takes a beautiful model and places her on a different plane of beautiful. I live in rural Oklahoma and I am still awestruck by nature%u2019s beauty. I don%u2019t see this work as taking natures place but it is just showing us a different plane of beautiful. John
Anonymous
-1 points
52 days ago
Real or not, corn or wheat what matters to me is the beauty of the photos. I love every one ... I look at the work through the photographers eyes and try to see what he wanted to create, I see such beauty! Excellent job!
Anonymous
-1 points
52 days ago
Amazing work. I have only one complaint. And yes I know its not corn. The picture with the girl running on the road with the flowers in her hand is driving me crazy. Her hand actually disappeared and the shadowing is all wrong. The sun hits the grass along the road incorrectly and the sunlight on the girl is thrown off as well. If that picture were removed, the collection would be perfect.
Anonymous
-1 points
46 days ago
don't you think her hand is just in her pocket?
Anonymous
-1 points
44 days ago
nono, the image with the girl that has flowerd protruding from the stub where her right hand should be. The other one's alright.
Anonymous
-1 points
53 days ago
hey lol thats a wheat field!
Anonymous
-1 points
53 days ago
you negative people: is it really that great of a deal that you have to spazz out because something is labeled corn field and it's a wheat field? and that you have to automatically label something awful because someone may or may not have photoshopped a picture. just chill out, it may not be real, but it's still enjoyable. :)
Anonymous
-1 points
54 days ago
veronika_pinke--- i suppose thats the name of our fav artist ;)....awesome work, amazing! top notch !!
Anonymous
-2 points
55 days ago
For the most part, I really liked the photos. As for those that don't like it-I don't think it was intended to look real. It's sort of a modern, digital take on surrealism. Obviously they've been photoshopped, sometimes making a picture look too "real" seems too fake. Think of it as a world drawn up like an Alice and Wonderland story, unrealistic but beautiful.
Anonymous
1 points
52 days ago
nicely put.
Anonymous
-2 points
56 days ago
very great !!
Anonymous
-2 points
57 days ago
wow its called corn field, but has anyone realized that its a wheat field? theres no corn anywhere
Anonymous
-1 points
53 days ago
You are obviously not a native English speaker or you would recognize a corn field when you see one. Even a decent American English dictionary will educate you that corn refers to grain. You must be thinking that "sweet corn field" was meant, forgetting that is is native to the Americas like tomatoes, ground nuts (potatoes), & bannanas. So explain how Joseph in Genesis saved Egypt & the tribe of Israel by storing wheat for seven years? Seemingly, that was a wee bit before America was discovered. About 4,000 years of corn fields without Indian corn, what history can teach us about language! dcneby.
Anonymous
1 points
52 days ago
I have no idea what the hell you are trying to say. Did you mean that the Bible referred to corn? Because you said wheat and ruined your point. Plus corn is corn, wheat is wheat. Silly mistake, get over it. Life as we know it doesn't depend on it. Anyway, Good job pretending like you know everything and then ruin your biblical evidence.
Anonymous
-1 points
48 days ago
I happen to be a native English speaker and didn't know that corn meant wheat, it's not a word I've felt the need to look up in the dictionary. Don't be so pompous.
Anonymous
1 points
39 days ago
They happen to be right. In England and Scotland the edible grain of some plants can be called corn and hence the whole plant becomes call corn. I've heard the term used and I thought maybe it originated elsewhere other than the US. I just talked to my sis-in-law in the US where I am, who is a Brit and she right off knew what I meant when I her asked what they called some grain plants, such as wheat. She said, "You mean corn?" That is good enough for me to surmise that the photographer is maybe from that part of the world or at least familiar with that usage. The settlers would have brought that Olde English terminology with them to the US. Perhaps the one being pompous is the one who assumes since they have never heard the term used that way, then they are the one that is correct. I very much enjoyed the pictures.
Anonymous
-3 points
59 days ago
They are all awful. Nothing looks like that. Photoshop is a terrible thing in the wrong hands.
Anonymous
-2 points
56 days ago
I like different opinions. I'm a landscape photographer and always try to shoot a realistic scene but i can appreciate modern art and the creativity beyond reality. I think the images are beautiful. Do you not like them because you feel that people will be tricked into thinking that they are "real"? The software in itself, whether you are a genius at it and can do it the quickest time (well done hero who commented on being able to it fast with their brilliant CS3 knowledge, don't see you fast display of excellence out there) or whether it takes days to perfect the image to your liking, credit where credits due! To the creator of these images, congratulations and thank you for sharing these with us. Keep 'em coming